|
Search
engine news web log for February 2003.
For more recent search engine news, go to our Daily
Search Engine News Blog.
Webmasters
- Click Here to add our
highlighted search engine news headlines to your site.
Highlighted
Headings = important entries
>>
=
the point where a news item from our Search Light
newsletter continues.
>>
=
regular entries and commentary
Now,
on with the blog...
28 February 2003
>>
Busy day ahead so has to be a short blog today. First up, Google has been
granted its first
patent by the United States Patent Office for "a method of determining the relevance of Web pages in relation to search
queries". ZDNet has posted a more detailed story
since.
>>
Wall Street Journal article proves that spam doesn't pay, but still Web
Sites Try Everything to Climb Google Rankings.
>>
Googletoon of the Week :

Copyright © 2003 Verity
Intellectual Properties Pty Ltd
Cartoon courtesy of Google
Village
27 February 2003
>>
The industry is still buzzing with yesterday's shock announcement that
Overture is to purchase FAST/AllTheWeb web search. Forum buddy Chris_D
coined an amusing acronym for the new entity: AllOverFast. He also
coined some others for MSN/LookSmart/WiseNut that I can't mention (-;
Danny Sullivan has
now made his comments
on the acquisition. Interestingly, Danny seems to think the double purchase
was a case of compulsive shopping, with Overture buying two search companies
when they only needed one. He thinks that Overture will probably only
concentrate on building up one of the sites, most likely AllTheWeb.com as
opposed to AltaVista.com. Danny makes no mention of the value of AltaVista's
paid inclusion and direct feed technology to Overture's strategy. However I
still think that was their primary motivation for purchasing AltaVista and my
views are reinforced by this
article.
One fascinating
tidbit confirmed by Danny was the fact that MSN was also interested in
purchasing AltaVista and Overture beat them to it. Danny points out that MSN
may well have wanted to buy FAST as an alternative to AltaVista and had their
plans stifled again by Overture. This could possibly force them to take
drastic action. He also claims out that Overture's major European competitor Espotting
may have factored into the FAST purchase - with Espotting's partnership with
FAST now under threat. Meanwhile, everyone is waiting for MSN to make their
move. Will they partner with LookSmart / WiseNut or will they enter
negotiations with AskJeeves / Teoma? Would they have the gall to make Google
an offer? They could certainly afford to, but we assume (and hope!) Google
would laugh in their faces. Surely a takeover from Microsoft would not be in
the best interests of Google's future.
>>
Apparently, AltaVista has updated
it's news search. Whether this was in spite of or a result of the
Overture purchase is not clear.
>>
Up and coming Australian enterprise search firm YourAmigo
have reported their first profitable month, ahead of schedule. Thanks for the
press release guys. If you'd included it on your site I could've linked to it.
26 February 2003
Overture
To Challenge Google with FAST Purchase
>>
My head is still spinning from the latest developments, but here's my initial
take on the Overture situation:
1) Overture sees Google as their major PPC competitor
2) Overture looks for ways to better compete with Google and recognizes two avenues: paid inclusion (which is a high earner and something Google doesn't offer) and algorithmic search (which is something Overture sorely lack expertise in).
3) Overture has plenty of money so goes on a shopping expedition to find the best PI and search co's they can buy outright.
4) (a guess) Overture makes an offer to Inktomi but Yahoo recognizes what they're up to
and makes Ink a better offer. They accept.
5) Overture makes an offer to the next best paid inclusion/direct feed technology provider AltaVista. They accept because they are already dead in the water.
6) Overture makes an offer to the only algorithmic search provider that has the reach and database size that could give Google a run for their money: FAST/AllTheWeb. FAST accept a generous deal for their WebSearch technology because with Inktomi out of the way, they want to focus on the open wide enterprise search industry anyway.
7) Yahoo position themselves to introduce their own Paid Inclusion offering and develop an internal PPC product, hence preparing to meet Google and Overture in a face off.
8) Overture position themselves to introduce Paid Inclusion using AV technology and algorithmic search using FAST technology, hence preparing to face off with Google and (to a lesser degree), Yahoo.
9) MSN and LookSmart remain quiet, discussing amongst themselves whether to partner with the other 3 or form a joint partnership to challenge them.
10) Google stand on the sidelines witnessing the other teams in training and thinking now would be a good time to launch an IPO.
I'm not the only one speculating.
Now someone please stop this ride, I want to get off!
25 February 2003
>>
The Register reports
today that Google has removed a perverted Web site from its search listings following a public outcry from people in
Chester, U.K.
>>
Guest Writer for Search Engine Guide, Scott Buresh, asks Are
Your Search Engine Rankings at Risk?
>>
David Gallagher of the New York Times pontificates
that Google's recent deal to purchase Blogger.com may freshen up Google's own
links.
24 February 2003
MSN
Extends Deal With Inktomi
21 February 2003
Ask
Jeeves UK Launches Paid Inclusion
Ask Jeeves UK has launched
a Paid Inclusion product, allowing webmasters to pay a fee that guarantees
their web pages will be included in Ask
Jeeves UK.
Costing £40 for the first URL and £25 for URLs 2-200,
Site Submit
is similar to the paid inclusion service already offered by Ask
Jeeves in the U.S. The service includes:
-
Guaranteed inclusion of website URLs within the Ask Jeeves search index.
-
Improved quality of traffic for websites - register deeper content pages.
-
Optimised performance for websites - updated and refreshed webpages and new content will be matched against relevant search queries.
-
Transparent and accountable results - your own account page will display click throughs in text and chart format.
The company claims
their U.K. audience has now grown to over 7 million unique users per month.
This is all fine
and dandy, but I have a question to Ask Jeeves: Why did you think it was
necessary to email a 5.5 megabyte media release attachment that takes those of
us with a dial-up connection 20 minutes to download? Doesn't make for good
media relations.
>>
Googletoon of the Week :

Copyright © 2003 Verity
Intellectual Properties Pty Ltd
Cartoon courtesy of Google
Village
>>
Anybody who subscribes to Jill Whalen's excellent SEO Newsletter High
Rankings Advisor will know that she launched her new e-book The
Nitty-Gritty of Writing for the Search Engines last week. What you may
not know, if you haven't already bought it, is how fantastic it is! In the
search engine biz, there are so many newsletters, articles and e-books
published that it's easy to become overwhelmed with information. Many of these
publications talk about highly technical issues and use insider jargon that
does nothing but confuse people unfamiliar with the industry.
As I said to Jill
in an email when I was halfway through the book, It's nice to read an e-book that gets back to SEO basics rather than concentrating on search engine algorithms, PageRank
or Pay-Per-Click. For USD 49, Nitty-Gritty simply spells it all out for
you: where to place your keyword phrases, how to use real text, how to make
your copy make sense to your readers and things to avoid, all with crystal
clear, practical, step-by-step examples. Heck, even I learned a few things and
I've been optimizing sites for over six years!
I highly recommend Nitty-Gritty
to any webmaster seeking advice on how to edit their site copy or improve
the search engine compatibility of their web site. Well done Jill! And before
you ask, yes that is my affiliate link above - I was so impressed I asked Jill
to sign me up as an affiliate immediately. If you'd like to buy the book and
would prefer I didn't receive a commission, just click on this
link instead.
>>
About.com columnist Jennifer Laycock has written an historical piece about the
last five years in the search industry titled: Looking
Back on 5 Years of Search.
>>
Guest Writer for Search Day Elizabeth Osmeloski looks at Hot
Trends in Search Engine Marketing, a special report from the Search Engine Strategies conference
held in Dallas last December.
>>
Cool Forum Thread of the Day
: Gimpsy
- the industrious hampster - Up and coming search directory Gimpsy has
announced some major changes and enhancements this week.
20 February 2003
Interview
With Dakota Sullivan of LookSmart
Vice President of
LookSmart, Dakota Sullivan, is a busy man. He must be, considering he
took nearly a month to answer my interview questions. I find this amusing,
given that it was LookSmart's own PR staff who suggested the interview in the
first place. Perhaps my questions required more research? Perhaps he didn't like
the questions and hoped to avoid them?
Whatever, but after
some aggressive follow up this end, we finally have our interview with Mr
Sullivan. In it he reveals how the Yahoo/Inktomi deal will affect LookSmart,
the new features LookSmart will be introducing for Small Business Listings
customers shortly and why he thinks WiseNut is a better search engine partner for the major portals
than Google.
<snippet>"Google provides an excellent search experience, and has helped raise the bar in terms of search relevancy for the entire industry. However, Google's rapid growth has come at the expense of its partners' search
franchises".</snippet>
Read the full Interview
With Dakota Sullivan.
>>
Danny Sullivan held back publication of his Search Engine Update yesterday so
he could comment
on Overture's purchase of AltaVista.
>>
Not to be outdone by side-kick Chris Sherman, Danny also weighed
in on Google's purchase of Blogger.com.
>>
Everything's coming up Google today. Check out Google
AdWords Checker, a new type of pay per click bid management software
tool for Google AdWords campaigns and GooFresh,
a search tool allowing users to query Google for new "Freshbot" site
additions by date.
>>
Just when we thought Google Labs had taken over R&D for the entire
Internet, some scientist discovers a new
way to search the web.
<snippet>"Jon Kleinberg, a professor of computer science at Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y., has developed a method for a computer to find the topics that dominate a discussion at a particular time by scanning large collections of documents for sudden, rapid bursts of
words".</snippet>
>>
Cool Forum Thread of the Day
: How
to get listed in Google in 30 days - discussion about how sites
running weblogs tend to get included in Google a lot faster than others.
19 February 2003
AltaVista
Snapped Up By Overture 
Internet search company
Overture made
the shock announcement today that it would be purchasing search portal AltaVista
from CMGI Inc. for $140 million in cash and stock.
In their end of the
deal, to be completed in April, Overture will pay
AltaVista in common stock valued at $80 million, plus $60 million in
cash and assume certain AltaVista liabilities. The deal represents a
strategic move by Overture to expand their current product offerings
outside the realm of pay-per-click and to start competing with rivals such as Google
and Yahoo in the mainstream algorithm-based search market.
According to
Overture's Media
Release on the announcement:
"The acquisition will enable Overture to offer a significantly enhanced Web search solution to portals, Internet service providers (ISPs) and other destination sites, as well as additional marketing opportunities to the company's large base of advertisers."
The purchase
decision was also thought to be a direct result of Yahoo's proposed $235 million acquisition of Inktomi.
Overture currently uses Inktomi technology to provide back up algorithmic search results
to their paid results, calling these listings "backfill." Yahoo's
purchase of Inktomi may have put Overture's
partnership with Inktomi in jeopardy, or made their use of Inktomi
technology no longer financially viable, meaning they had to either develop algorithm search in-house or
look elsewhere. Purchasing the struggling search portal AltaVista
appears to have been the preferred solution.
According to
observers, Overture plans to license AltaVista's technology to its customers, which include
Yahoo, MSN and AOL Europe. Overture also will use AltaVista.com to test new search services and marketing products for its advertisers.
In a conference call to investors, Overture president and CEO, Ted Meisel,
said that AltaVista would open additional revenue streams for Overture
and build on its pay-per-click advertising by giving marketers the option to participate in
AltaVista's paid-inclusion program.
With Yahoo
supposedly developing their own in-house paid listings program and moving into
Overture's paid search market territory, and now Overture making
their foray into the algorithmic search industry, it's abundantly clear that search
continues to be the major area of growth in the online advertising
industry.
>>
Ever have days when no matter how focused you are, you keep getting
distracted? That was my day today. I have been trying to publish this blog for
hours, but keep getting phone calls or postal deliveries, or interruptions or
clients sending me the latest
TopSiteListings email scam and wanting to know if they should pay
.
Still, the delays meant I could include the breaking news story above, so I
guess I should be grateful!
>>
Both Forbes
and SearchDay
decide to weigh in on Google's acquisition of Blogger.com.
>>
Inktomi Makes a Statement
Regarding Operation of the Inktomi Search Engine. Hmmm, I
haven't seen this page before. I wonder if it is the end-result of the recent
"paid inclusion spam" debate? <snippet>The results that are
displayed in response to a search may include URLs from Web site owners who
have agreed to pay Inktomi or one of its resellers for value-added services,
such as expedited review of their Web content. The URLs submitted by
participating Web site owners are subject to the same rigorous analysis and
editorial rules as all other URLs in the index. The specific links that are
displayed as search results and the order in which they appear are not
influenced by any business arrangement between Inktomi and a Web site owner.</snippet>
>>
Larry Page reveals
that he and fellow Google developer Sergey Brin didn't intend to build a
search engine.
>>
Cool Forum Thread of the Day
: Overture
to buy AltaVista - the latest
deal is the talk of the forums today.
18 February 2003
>>
Author and radio host James Maduk shows his pitiful lack of knowledge about
search engine marketing in this interview
on the WebTalkGuy's Radio Show:
"I only get
about six or seven hits per day from Google. Maybe I picked the wrong keywords
or just barking up the wrong tree with my service. The bottom line is I
didn’t get the value or traffic that I thought I would get in a search
engine. Search engines, for small businesses in general, are probably a waste
of time." Woof woof, James.
I was putting
together some successful
client case studies for our SEO biz over the weekend and it struck me
just how powerful and effective a well-timed, well planned search engine
optimization campaign can be for small business. Site traffic increases for
some of my small biz clients range from 42 to 650 percent! Their ROI is so
high that their SEO campaigns pay for themselves within a few months. A waste
of time? They certainly don't think so.
>>
Popdex - the
Website Popularity Index - is becoming increasingly popular in it's own right.
Designed as a current events news and
link spider, you can search Popdex via the search box below to see how
many other sites are linking to a particular article or page on your site:
>>
Found an interesting article written by my old "boss" Martin
Lindstrom yesterday. The
Art of Asking the Right Questions looks at how to use questions and
calls-to-action in your web site copy to avoid being blocked by your visitor's
own personal advertising filters. <snippet>"Often we attempt to elicit action by presenting statements
like, 'Fill out this form to be covered for damage on your home contents'.
This example would hardly persuade you to do any such thing. Your mental advertising filter would flick it off effortlessly. The statement's a hackneyed reflection of a non-consumer-centered approach, and we're all immune to such monologue. But consider something
like, 'Are you covered if your house burns down? If not, fill out this
form'."</snippet>
>>
Cool Forum Thread of the Day
: To
hyphen or underline, that is the question - Takes a look at the age
old question of whether to use hyphens or underscores between keywords in page
URLs and discusses which is better from both a search engine and user
perspective.
17 February 2003
>>
Google has taken their love affair with blogs to a new level this week, with
their purchase
of Pyra Labs, owners of Blogger.com
and a San Francisco company that created some of the earliest technology for writing
weblogs. Bloggers worldwide unite to celebrate!
>>
Robert Clough of Search
Engine Guide nearly gave me a heart attack on the weekend by linking
from the ihelpyou forums to an article with the heading Google
Goes Public. Thankfully, it was only Red Herring contemplating about
why Google probably WON'T go public. Phew! Thanks Rob, you really know how to
scare a girl! I'm sure there were plenty of other hearts beating wildly around
the globe when that headline hit the Moreover newsfeeds yesterday...
>>
The team at Google Watch is up to their old tricks again - this time comparing
Google with George Orwell's Big Brother, just because Matt Cutts, a key Google engineer,
apparently used to work for the National Security Agency. With all due respect
Mr Brandt, we suggest you get a life.
>>
CNet takes a stab at guessing where Yahoo's buyout of Inktomi will lead, in
their article Will
Yahoo's Search Lead to a New Star?
>>
Been to LookSmart.com
lately? No me neither. Which is why I was surprised to see a brand new home
page design when I popped in on the weekend. Gone are many of their categories
and banner ads and in their place is a sleek "Googlesque" design,
with very prominent links to their paid advertising options. Not sure when the
new look went live, but the that fact nobody has yet noticed or bothered to
report it says a lot about their popularity, dontcha think?
>>
Cool Forum Thread of the Day
: How
evil is Google :) - Google opens up the whole anti-gun vs "right
to bear arms" debate without actually meaning to.
14 February 2003
>>
It's that time of year again, when florists increase their prices by 500
percent, restaurant bookings become difficult to come by and jewellers sell
out of diamond solitaire engagement rings. Yep - Valentine's Day. Hope you and
yours have a nice one and don't get too burnt by the commercialism of it all.
Why not celebrate a week late and avoid the price hike?
>>
Chris Sherman of Search Day takes a look at What's
New at AltaVista and MSN Search.
>>
Googletoon of the Week :

Copyright © 2003 Verity
Intellectual Properties Pty Ltd
Cartoon courtesy of Google
Village
>>
Prominent SEO and forum buddy Jill Whalen's latest article on Search Engine
Guide looks at the disadvantages of using Additional
Domains for Extra Search Engine Rankings. Speaking of Jill, she's just
released her new e-book and from what I hear, sales are going great. I'll be
reviewing it for you here very soon. Congratulations Jill!
>>
Cool Forum Thread of the Day
: How
does a database driven web site get indexed? - A look at how Googlebot
treats database driven sites when indexing.
13 February 2003
Media
Giants Take a "Bite" Out of Gator
Some of
America's largest news agencies have settled
a dispute out of court over an Internet advertising practice in which
unauthorized, third-party ads from Gator Corp. pop up on their sites.
The much despised Gator Corp. are the developers of TopText, a
software program that automatically installs itself and generates pop-up
advertisements in the browsers of persons that have the generic Gator
software installed.
The pop-ups
allegedly encourage users to click away from the site they are browsing and
visit competing sites which are linked within the pop up itself. Problem is,
persons downloading Gator software, (a tool for filling out online forms and remembering
passwords), often don't realize they have automatically provided permission
for TopText to be installed as well. This type of pop-up software is
often referred to as thiefware or scumware
because it "steals" traffic away from sites.
The New York Times, USA Today, The Wall Street Journal and The Washington Post
were amongst news outlets that sued Gator Corp. last year over the
issue. U.S. District Judge Claude Hilton in Alexandria, Va., granted a preliminary injunction ordering Gator to stop delivering pop-up ads at the sites run by those companies. Trial was to begin last
month but has been averted by the undisclosed settlement. Separate lawsuits
against Gator Corp. by United Parcel Service (UPS) and Six Continents Hotels and Inter-Continental Hotels chains
are still pending.
>>
According to a new
survey from StatMarket, the majority of Internet users now go directly
to the sites they want by typing in URLs or accessing bookmarks, rather than
surfing from site to site. Gone is the curiosity factor and so webmasters need
to work even harder on their site content to attract eyeballs. Despite the
shift in usage patterns, search engines are still a key influencer of user
behavior:
"Not only is search engine use
growing, people are getting better at using them", said Matthew Berk,
a senior analyst at Jupiter Research. "In fact, many Net users
initially find sites through search engines and then bookmark them, or type in
the URLs, which may account for the increase in direct navigation",
Berk said.
>>
Search Day has published a special report by Shari Thurow from the recent
Dallas Search Engine Strategies Conference called Optimizing
Flash for Search Engines. Great stuff!
>>
MSN Search comes to the stunning realization
that they can fit more search results into their site and display them 65
percent faster by getting rid of banner ads. Well duh!
>>
Cool Forum Thread of the Day
: Yahoo!
and Inky - No, it's not a new cartoon duo, it's a discussion about the
future of Inktomi and how Inktomi search results will be
integrated into those of it's new owner, Yahoo.
12 February 2003
>>
Some days are worth waking up for. A little birdie has anonymously sent me a
copy of the latest court documents to hit desks in the Search King vs Google
lawsuit. These could easily be the funniest legal documents ever!
Key points:
1. On January 17, the Search King crew submitted a Brief
in Support of Motion to Alter and/or Amend Judgement which
included a discussion about patent law, a doctoral thesis and info from Google's web site" as
extrinsic evidence.
2. Then came Google's
Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss on February 4
In a nutshell, Google's response was that the latest "evidence"
presented by Search King was not only inaccurate but irrelevant because the allegations
Search King are making are already presumed true for the purposes of the Motion to Dismiss. Google also pointed out that even if
Search King were offering the evidence to contradict its allegations, the evidence is also irrelevant because it is inconsistent with
Search King's Amended Complaint.
Priceless comment from the Google team : "Incredibly, in its Response Brief, Search King now blatantly admits that it manipulated the ranking algorithms employed by Google".
IMO, the Motion to Dismiss will be granted shortly to bring an end to this circus act.
Meanwhile, the legal documents are available (for a price!) on the Search King
site via the links above.
>>
Remember our Cool Forum Thread of the Day for January 29? We pointed out a
thread that discussed an email scam from some jokers posing to be
representatives of Yahoo UK, asking customers to fork over a £199 renewal fee
for their Yahoo listing, (despite the fact that Yahoo UK does not charge an
annual renewal fee). Anyway, it seems that the scam has finally caught the
attention of Yahoo UK, thanks to a public outing by my forum buddy Jill Whalen
in one of her High
Ranking's Advisor newsletters. The Register reports
that after a 2 week silence on the issue, Yahoo UK has finally made a public
statement:
"Yahoo! UK & Ireland has learned that some of its Yahoo! Express customers recently received a fraudulent e-mail that requests a £199 renewal fee to remain in the Yahoo! Directory. This email is not from Yahoo!. As always, Yahoo! Express in the UK charges a once only, non-refundable processing fee per submission. This has not changed.
If you have received such an email, please do not respond to it. Instead, please forward it to us at
uk-legal@uk.yahoo-inc.com." Well done Jill!
>>
Google has apparently won Brand
of the Year over icons like Coke, IKEA and Apple. Congratulations
Googlers! Thanks to Robert
Clough for the heads up.
>>
Cool Forum Thread of the Day
: Google
penalising keywords - A discussion about how Googlebot and other
search engines treat the META keyword tag and what content you should include
within it.
11 February 2003
>>
Extensible Markup Language, otherwise known as XML, turned
5 yesterday. Whoopdedoo!
>>
I posted
the following news item in the forums on the weekend, but forgot to mention it
here in the blog yesterday:
Overture
Doubles Minimum Bid for Advertisers
Overture
has doubled their minimum bid for U.S. PPC campaigns from USD 0.05 to 0.10 and
advertisers are far
from happy. The warning signs started flashing when Overture
UK announced last month that their minimum bid was going to increase
from £0.05 to £0.10 from February 6 onwards.
Overture
U.S. customers had their fears confirmed with the arrival of an email from
Overture on February 8, with the USD minimum bid increase taking immediate
effect. Thankfully, existing bids between 0.05 and 0.09 are being "grandfathered"
at their current max bid for the foreseeable future. But if advertisers decide
to change existing bid amounts or add new bids, they must comply with the new
minimum.
Interestingly,
long-term advertisers at Overture who retain grandfathered listings ranging
from 0.01 to 0.04 (prior to Overture's last minimum bid increase to 0.05) will
see their minimum bid increase to 0.05 from March 29.
The
price hike signals a significant change in Overture's target market over the
years. Because of the company's increasing popularity, their administrative
and overhead costs have increased to the point where it make sense for them to
target large scale or high-end advertisers and spend less time dealing with
thousands of smaller firms and individual webmasters. Unfortunately, such
economies of scale mean smaller advertisers once again lose out to those with
deep pockets.
Fortunately,
Overture's shift in focus provides an enormous opportunity for other PPC
search providers to step in and gather up Overture's so called "left-overs".
Overture's biggest competitor, Google
AdWords, still offers a USD 0.05 minimum bid, as do Kanoodle,
Ah-ha,
FindWhat and
Europe's most popular PPC engine Espotting.
In fact Kanoodle is offering Pandia readers a free $5 PPC account with no
deposit required (Click
Here for more info). There are of course many other smaller PPC
players who will be celebrating Overture's price increase because it gives
them an opportunity to increase their market share.
As
Pandia
comments on the subject: "Overture is one of the most important pay-per-click text ads providers on the Net. When Overture changes its price structure, this has consequences for the whole
industry".
>>
Fellow Search Engine Guide columnist, Daria
Goetsch,
stresses the value of writing articles to improve your site's link popularity.
To prove her point, I'm linking to her
article. (-:
>>
Cool Forum Thread of the Day
: What
exactly is ethical SEO? - Come and join this interesting discussion
about "ethical" vs "unethical" search engine optimization
techniques. Is there really a need for such a distinction? Some of us think
so...
10 February 2003
>>
It's Monday, apparently. Where the heck did the weekend go? Due to the sudden
influx of SEO clients and enquiries, staff here don't tend to get much of
their weekends off. Could it be that SEO has finally gone mainstream? Our
activity level over the past two months certainly indicates this. Hmmm if this
keeps up, we'll have to advertise for new staff...
>>
Google Village looks at how to Get
Fresh Listings in Google Each Day.
>>
Jill Whalen answers the question Are
Search Engine Case Sensitive Regarding Keywords?
>>
Cool Forum Thread of the Day
: Aquarium
Screensaver Kazaa Scam - A warning about a new email scam going
around, tricking people into installing the much despised scumware Kazaa
under the 'guise of downloading a free screensaver.
7 February 2003
Terra
Lycos Slashes Workforce by 20 Percent
In a
serious cost cutting measure, Spanish Internet Search firm
has sacked more than 20 percent of its United Staff staff this week, bringing total US staff down to 500.
The cuts were apparently necessary in light of major losses for the company, a direct result of a worldwide slump in online advertising expenditure. The across the board job losses impacted several offices nationwide, including including Waltham, Massachusetts, New York, Miami, San Francisco and California.
The cost cutting measure comes amid extensive management shuffling, sparked 3 months ago by the resignation of Terra Lycos' former head of U.S. operations, Stephen Killeen.
>>
Authors of the Google
Village saw my post yesterday and appreciated the feedback on their
Googletoons. They even invited viewers to post their own ideas for 'toon
scenarios and their author will create them as time allows. Got an idea for a
funny Googletoon? Post them in this
forum thread and see them come to life. Meanwhile, I've been given
permission to post one 'toon a week here in the blog. So without further ado:
>>
Googletoon of the Week :

Copyright © 2003 Verity
Intellectual Properties Pty Ltd
Cartoon courtesy of Google
Village
>>
Cool Forum Thread of the Day
: RDF
dump - Finally the latest Open Directory RDF Dump is available for
download. This thread tracks the best download locations and instructions.
6 February 2003
>>
It's a public holiday in New Zealand today: Waitangi Day commemorates the signing of a treaty at Waitangi,
in the Bay of Islands, on 6 February 1840 by a group of Maori chiefs and the British Government.
As I look out the
office window at all the yachts, pleasure boats, windsurfers and kayakers
sailing by in typical "day off" mode, I am definitely envious.
Unfortunately, the search engine industry does not take a day off, meaning no
holiday for me today :-(. Just as well I love this business...
>>
First up today is this whole cloaking debate, stirred up by forum buddy Alan
Perkin's article Why
Cloaking is Always a Bad Idea. As you know if you are a regular fan of
this blog, Alan's article resulted in a fascinating thread
at the ihelpyou services forums, attracting a number of search engine
heavyweights to enter the ring and throw a few verbal swings. Danny Sullivan
and Alan Perkins circled each other round after round, but the match was
pretty much a draw at the end of it all.
As a result of the
debate, today Danny published his
official position on cloaking in his latest Search Engine Update newsletter.
Titled Ending
the Debate Over Cloaking, Danny dissects the issue from all angles,
concluding with his revised personal definition of cloaking:
"Cloaking is getting a search engine to record content for a URL that is different than what a searcher will ultimately see, often intentionally. It can be done in many technical ways. Several search engines have explicit bans against unapproved cloaking, of which Google is the most notable one. Some people cloak without approval and never have problems. Some even may cloak accidentally. However, if you cloak intentionally without approval -- and if you deliver content to a search engine that is substantially different from what a search engine records -- then you stand a much larger chance of being penalized by search engines with penalties against unapproved cloaking. If in doubt, ask the search engine if it has a problem with what you intend to do, assuming you can't get a clear answer from written guidelines that are provided. If you are working with a third-party search engine marketer, ask them for proof that what they intend to do is approved. Otherwise, be prepared for any adverse consequences."
Personally, I'm
very glad to see the disclaimers in the last two sentences. There has been too
much fog surrounding the cloaking issue and not enough attention given to the
risks, in my opinion. As Danny is so widely read and respected, hopefully his
position will make webmasters think twice before implementing unapproved
cloaking tactics.
>>
In the same article, Danny looks at a related issue gaining notoriety at the
moment: XML feeds. He says "As with AltaVista, there's evidence that XML feeds have been an effective way for some companies to feed and cloak content that might not otherwise have met Inktomi's content guidelines.
Inktomi admits that its XML feeds do technically violate its posted guidelines about cloaking and says its now looking to amend these".
Interesting point and one that Alan Perkins tried repeatedly to make in that
linked forum thread.
The article
continues: "the real issue is that XML feeds and perhaps paid inclusion in general is allowing some people to provide content in a radically different way than has been generally accepted when content is gathered for free.
In particular, promotion that people have done in the past via traditional doorway pages and cloaking -- and have been banned for -- now can now be done under the guise of content feeding, with the search engines that offer this."
This is exactly the
point I was discussing in that same forum thread. To think that search engines
sanction spam as long as it is paid for is pretty alarming! It's all about
double standards. As Danny states: "If low-content doorway pages are not acceptable editorial content when found by a search engine spider naturally, should they suddenly be OK when read via paid inclusion programs? If there's a debate to be having, this is it."
Hear, Hear. I'd like to hear reader's thoughts about this. Please email
me with your comments.
>>
In case you missed it via the link above, Jill Whalen's latest High Rankings
newsletter contains a useful FAQ exchange about switching web site servers and
how this affects search engine robots, particularly Googlebot. Take a look at Will
Switching Servers Ruin My Rankings?
>>
Apparently, Yahoo
is expanding their relationship with Overture. <snippet>"Rashtchy said Yahoo was using Overture, in a test program, to provide paid results in colored boxes off-set on the right side of the search page, much in the same fashion as other search engines like Google and Lycos have done."</snippet>.
Thanks to Robert
Clough for the heads up.
>>
Quite by accident, I came across the Google
Village today. This clever site features a very amusing Google blog in
text and audio formats, complete with cartoons. <snippet>"If you are listed in Google, you live in the Google Village. This site explores what is in the Google Village, the particular biases that are built into the system, and the issues to do with
Google's editorializing, such as censorship, and legal issues."</snippet>
The site is run by
Australian researcher and Verity employee, Dr Elwyn Jenkins. Check out the Googletoons
in particular. My personal fav is the receptionist fielding a call: "Sorry
I cannot disturb him. He is Googling at the moment". Well worth a
look!
>>
Cool Forum Thread of the Day
: LookSmart
Listings Missing? - Apparently MSN is experiencing a glitch causing
LookSmart listings to not show up on MSN.com. Is it *really* a glitch?
5 February 2003
>>
It's been dubbed "vanity Googling". Typing your name into Google
to see what comes up can be a cathartic or terrifying experience according to
the Boston Globe article A
Nation of Voyeurs. Of course I had to try it. Thankfully, the first
100 or so references are to my articles about search engine
optimization.
But
some results did take my eyebrows up a notch. Take the Kalena
Forum for instance. Yes, it seems I have a forum dedicated all to me
(or some Italian person with the same first name). Hopefully they'll be able
to increase their 3 person membership soon. And according to Googlism,
I am either "a beautifully tanned brunette with a very tight body"
or "crippled with the severest case of arthritis I have ever seen".
Astounding how relevant Google can be!
Apparently Googling
your prospective dates is a common practice in the U.S. Discovering your
potential mate's hobbies, breast size, employment history and true gender can
save you hours of conversation and heartache. But, as Veronica Leger, a 39-year-old marketing professional,
points out in the article: "It feels kind of creepy to be Googled."
>>
Fascinating trivia morsels about Google revealed in the Boston Globe
article mentioned above:
-
Google
saves lives. Apparently instead of calling their doctor, some people type their symptoms into
Google and a few have learned they were in the early stages of a heart attack.
-
The search engine
fields 150 million queries a day
-
Google's
first office was a 5 bedroom house in Menlo Park, owned by a friend and
rented for USD 1,700 a month.
-
For those of
you who don't already know, Google takes its name from "googol," the mathematical term for a 1 followed by 100 zeros.
-
Google has more than 600 employees in 15 locations worldwide. It offers search results in 36
languages and half its traffic comes from outside the United States.
-
Google's lobby
features a pool table, a free juice bar, a baby grand piano, 1980s-style arcade games, and
a collection of lava lamps.
-
The company
owns 10,000 servers; cheap PCs loaded with memory and sitting in racks in several high-security data storage facilities around the
United States.
-
Google has
built up such a reputation for reliability that we simply assume what it
produces must be what we're looking for, even though context is often
absent from the search results.
-
Sergey Brin's
birth date is August 21, 1973.
-
Craig
Silverstein is a major fan of The Muppets and maintains the FAQ list on a Muppets
web site.
>>
Overture has
struck an exclusive two-year agreement with
ESPN.com to offer its commercial search results throughout the sports Web site.
ESPN will incorporate up to seven "sponsored" links from Overture that will be
listed separately in search results pages.
>>
Cool Forum Thread of the Day
: Content
really does matter - A nice success story of a webmaster who
successfully used ethical search engine optimization techniques to get her
non-profit web site ranking highly. The thread also has some Google linking
arguments thrown in for good measure.
4 February 2003
>>
It's been pretty quiet on the search engine scene this week (knock on wood!).
I'm not complaining, it's given me more time to focus on client SEO work, but
it sure is weird. Knowing this industry, it's probably just the calm before
the storm.
>>
A very excited member of AltaVista's National Account Executive emailed
me today, with the hyped up subject line "Trusted Feed Program and we can build the feed!!!".
The excitement didn't stop at the subject line either. The first sentence
read: "This is the best way you can list all your products from your catalog on our
search engine for next to nothing and we can build the feed for you!!!".
Excuse me while I hyperventilate.
Excessive use of
exclamation marks aside, I really can't see any value in trusted feed and I'm
not sure why I was targeted. Perhaps it was a result of my comments in this
thread? Or perhaps AltaVista staff should lighten up on the
coffee...
>>
French site Enfin has published an interview
with Tim Mayer of FAST/AllTheWeb.
When asked "What are the things that a webmaster mustn't do?",
Tim replied "A webmaster should create pages and sites for users not search engines. Ask yourselves,
'if search engines didn't exist, would I be doing this?'". Now that
sounds eerily like a certain Mr Perkins.
>>
Cool Forum Thread of the Day
: Spam
at Inktomi - Nothing like a little controversy to spice things up mid
week! A poster has decided to report Inktomi to the FTC for alleged breaches
of the FTC's guidelines for public disclosure of commercial considerations,
via their Index Connect trusted fe |